[Nagiosplug-devel] devloper guidelines..

[Volker.Aust at premiere.de]

I'm using named subroutines too. Is this restriction only important when
using ePN? Currently I'm not using ePN. Is there any possibility to test a
perl plugin for conformity with ePN beside to have a second installation?

To the naming: I'm a friend of verbose names. My scheme is to include not
only the 'transport' for the check (_snmp_, _smb_, ...) but also the source
of the information. I have several plugins which get their information over
SNMP from diffent MIB's. Eg.

check_snmp_cim_cpu	cpu utilization from Compaq Insight Manager
check_snmp_cim_fs		filesys utilization from CIM
check_snmp_cim_therm	thermal status from CIM
check_snmp_lm_service	service check from Lan Manager MIB for NT/W2K
check_snmp_rdbms_???	(not started coding because waiting for an answer
from IBM relating DB2 and SNMP)

What do you think?

-vol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Subhendu Ghosh [mailto:sghosh at sghosh.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:56 PM
> To: NagiosPlug Devel
> Subject: [Nagiosplug-devel] devloper guidelines..
> 
> 
> about named subroutines restrictions..
> 
> Perhaps that should be nested named subroutines?
> see:
> http://perl.apache.org/guide/perl.html  
> 
> I use named subroutines all the time :)
> 
> Stanley - any comments?
> 
> -- 
> 
> -sg
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Nagiosplug-devel mailing list
> Nagiosplug-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagiosplug-devel
>