[Nagiosplug-devel] RE: [Nagios-users] performance data from plugins - does it exist?
Richard.Wu at fusepoint.com
Wed Sep 25 10:54:02 CEST 2002
Glad to hear that perfdata will be addressed in the core level. It is useful for users to look back for a while and do the trending. However, not every monitor is candidate for perfdata, only some of them are interested. So if you can put a perdata configuration per monitor level, it will be very helpful.
From: Subhendu Ghosh [mailto:sghosh at sghosh.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:38 AM
To: Karl DeBisschop
Cc: Jeremy Tinley; nagiosplug-devel at lists.sourceforge.net;
nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagiosplug-devel] RE: [Nagios-users] performance data from
plugins - does it exist?
On 14 Sep 2002, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> I do feel that performance data should be part of the formal 1.3.0
> release, although it's never been discussed to my knowlege. I just don't
> want to spend time logging performance data for every concievable
> variable on this pass, especailly if it requires tracking new timers and
> varibles for them, and other ancillary coding. I'd rather focus on
> getting a formal release that includes an acceptable level of detail
> done in a way that the most (all?) users and developers feel makes
I would prefer to make the performance data part of the 1.3.x release and
release 1.3.0 with additional stable plugins.
It would also be useful to discuss the overall size of the retrun string
and its impact in the nagios architecture. We are currently limited by
the size on the non-interleaved pipe message size for passively submitted
results. Do we want to differentiate plugins between active and passive
(I would think not..)
I thinks if a list of parameters to be measured from the existing plugins
could be developed (via contributions :) then we could decide on a base
set of parameters and naming guidelines for the parameters.
>From a diskio perspective, I would like to minimize or coordinate diskio
as much as possible for the perfdata - does this mean that nagios core
would have to support aggregate perfdata in addition to aggregate status?
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
More information about the Devel