[Nagiosplug-devel] will the pgsql-timestamp patch be released ?

[Karl DeBisschop]

On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 09:08, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
> Is the patch on Sourceforge?  if not, and you have a copy, can you post it 
> on SourceForge?
> 
> If you can get a patch, it can be applied to the plugin release 1.3 as a 
> bugfix.  1.3 is the current stable release of the plugins.
> 
> -sg

ISTM that the poster really meant Nagios, not the plugins, and posted
the wrong list?

The plugin does not use timestamp.

> On Wed, 14 May 2003, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> 
> > Hi, all.
> > 
> > I wanna ask a question. In 2002 I used nagios with postgresql. That
> > was fine.
> > 
> > Halfyear ago pgsql branch 7.2.x was released. Now the most stable
> > version is 7.3.2.
> > The nagios version available for download is STILL 1.0, with
> > pg-7.2.x (and 7.3.x too) incompatible format of timestamps. I monitor this maillist
> > regularily, and find a patch for it, but not succeed with it neither
> > with CVS version, nor with 1.0-rel.
> > 
> > So - is it possible to produce a stable beta as snapshot from CVS with patched timestamps for
> > pg-7.3.x, or to write a patch for 1.0 ?
> > 
> > I cannot use pgsql-7.1.x, 'cause 7.3.x is more stable.
> > 
> > ?
> >   
> > 
> >                                                 WBR
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nagiosplug-devel mailing list
> > Nagiosplug-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagiosplug-devel
> > ::: Please include plugins version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
> >