[Nagiosplug-devel] New plugins, autoconf & pre-built binaries

[Subhendu Ghosh]

Preference for a souped-up version is portability doesn't create too many 
problems in coding.

-sg

On 31 Mar 2003, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 05:00, Voon, Ton wrote:
> > check_cpu is actually a cpu check on processes, not the overall load on a
> > system. Maybe a rename to check_procs_cpu? If so, there is a check_vsz to
> > check the virtual size of processes - maybe this should change to
> > check_procs_vsz for consistency?
> > 
> > I also notice that the configure.in holds checks for an RSS_COMMAND,  but
> > there is no check_rss. Is this worthwhile to do? (I'm thinking a symlink of
> > check_vsz, but with slightly different processing, ala check_tcp / check_ftp
> > / check_telnet)
> 
> Actually, I'd prefer to see them all rolled up into on souped up version
> of check_procs. Is that feasible? Do other people consider a single
> program the better option?
> 
> To me, since we test status, owner, etc in check_procs, cpu usage is
> just more of the same.
> 
> Problem would be making it portable, of course.
> 
> --
> Karl
> 
> > Ton
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:	Karl DeBisschop [SMTP:karl at debisschop.net]
> > > Sent:	Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:43 AM
> > > To:	Ton Voon
> > > Cc:	NagiosPlug Devel
> > > Subject:	Re: [Nagiosplug-devel] New plugins, autoconf & pre-built
> > > binaries
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:41, Ton Voon wrote:
> > > > Just wanted some opinions on a few things.
> > > > 
> > > > 1) What's the policy on new plugins? I'm working on check_cpu from the 
> > > > New Plugins tracker on SF and - if I get it working - should it go into 
> > > > contrib/ or plugins/? What makes a plugin go from contrib to the main 
> > > > area?
> > > 
> > > Many people think of CPU usage and load together, with some
> > > justification. I'm wondering if we might not want to integreat the CPU
> > > checks into check_load? Thoughts?
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > This private and confidential e-mail has been sent to you by Egg.
> > The Egg group of companies includes Egg Banking plc
> > (registered no. 2999842), Egg Financial Products Ltd (registered
> > no. 3319027) and Egg Investments Ltd (registered no. 3403963) which
> > carries out investment business on behalf of Egg and is regulated
> > by the Financial Services Authority.  
> > Registered in England and Wales. Registered offices: 1 Waterhouse Square,
> > 138-142 Holborn, London EC1N 2NA.
> > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have
> > received it in error, please notify the sender by replying with
> > 'received in error' as the subject and then delete it from your
> > mailbox.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagiosplug-devel mailing list
> Nagiosplug-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagiosplug-devel
> ::: Please include plugins version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
> 

--